Posted by: FredA | August 27, 2012

Moving soon to the American Freedom Network

I contribute there and soon will host this blog there.

Keep fighting for American Freedom

Posted by: FredA | August 7, 2012

Obama’s Signature Move Unsealing Privat

Obama’s Signature Move Unsealing Private Records | Of course reponse will be about the author and NOT the issue addressed – http://ow.ly/cNebF

Posted by: FredA | August 6, 2012

#GlobalWarming #Debunked by #Intelligent

#GlobalWarming #Debunked by #IntelligentDesign – http://ow.ly/cM0Oi

Posted by: FredA | August 6, 2012

Who is the Facsist?

Neither of the political parties are “fascist” and its undeniable that fascism is a collectivist totalitarian government form.  Only those ignorant of very basic political science and history would deny it.  You display all the classic sheople traits politically.  Can’t separate politics from life.  Can’t separate ideology from anything.  Accuse others of acting in the way that you commonly do.  Project your own emotional motivations on to others.  Regurgitation of marginally credible sources when rare attempts at facts assertion are made.  When a source IS presented it is usually poorly sourced in its own right (ala that Britt link)  Consistently answer questions by not answering questions.  Consistently avoid points of discussion by dancing around the point(s) under discussion (name calling, strawmen, off topic)

Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement [Occupy that!] that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Sounds like Democrat “progressives” and other leftist self proclaimed victim groups to me.

Educate yourself beyond the quickest collectivist source you can find.  You do realize that thinking people who correspond with you know you’ll never change.  Its the other thinking people who are the target audience.  I must confess to some vicarious glee when leftist robotronic sheople are so roundly and widely laughed at, politically, by those who love freedom and actually think about the world around them.  Don’t worry Comrade, you don’t see it.  An advantage of your progressive blinders, harness and reins.

http://ow.ly/a6YRT

Posted by: FredA | August 6, 2012

More (yes MORE) collectivist Lib/Prog vacuous idiocy

Doesn’t it amaze you that otherwise nice and intelligent people can be so politically stupid?  All in pursuit of feeling good about themselves.

 

The captions was: Share this on your wall, and ask your friends. The correct answer, of course, is members of the Republican party and tea party.

(we add): and libertarian constitutionalist textualist originalists and anyone who studies tax policy and history in more than a generalized placard statement way.  Way too “simple”.  Here are some other views. http://ow.ly/cKQ0G and http://ow.ly/cKQ7l and finally explicitly in response to the picture – http://ow.ly/cKQoI.  No one is “tasked” with teaching our kids. They choose to. Although many if not most Lib/Progs think that “tasking” people to do things is a good idea.  Communities should be solely responsible for the costs and impacts of teach that community’s kids.  Given that, I’d never vote for cutting teachers pay unless there was nothing left to cut except local public safety.  I vote for mills and bonds in my community even with grown kids.  Simplified sound good envy/class based political statements aren’t going to sway people who think and what is posted above is unfounded hyperbole.  Freedom is a foreign concept to all stripes of socialist/collectivist utopians because its all about what THEY want and how THEY feel. Screw freedom and prosperity right lefties?

Posted by: FredA | August 3, 2012

Liberals don’t know the difference betw

Liberals don’t know the difference between fighting against and fighting FOR. Chik-fil-a fights FOR traditional family and marriage and against NOTHING. http://ow.ly/cJ1bR

Posted by: FredA | July 29, 2012

The left would like to increase this: ht

The left would like to increase this: http://ow.ly/czuEV

Posted by: FredA | July 27, 2012

Sheople believe anything

The anxious emotional left collectivists’ sheople demonstrate a remarkable capacity to believe ANYTHING

Let’s take a look at a Facebook posted picture that contains:

  1. Patent Falsehoods
  2. Incorrect statistics
  3. Pointless unsupportable bullets
  4. Typical collectivist abdication of personal liberty
So look at the picture and each bullet response to the total load of bull and deception that liberals will buy in ignorance (most of them) or propagate KNOWING its false and dishonest (sheople herding collectivists).  Also, collectively the picture is kind of pointlessly all over the place.  Projecting utopian fantasy and emotional baggage is a special trait of sheople.

See how liberal sheople will eat up all the BS shoveled

So here we go:

  • Bush signed the WS Bailouts (TARP which sensible folks opposed) in Dec ’08.  The money appropriated was spent (badly) by Obama.  Blaming Bush doesn’t diminish how Obama’s policies are destroying the country.  Obama followed the 700B he could blame on Bush with his own FAILED “stimulus” (porkulis  700+Bn).  That’s 1.4 TRILLION of, that’s right, YOUR MONEY that no one but Obama and a Demonrat Congress spent.
  • Fascism, Socialism and Communism are ALL collectivist authoritarian forms of polity.  Any differences hardly matter beyond that.  To posit otherwise is ignorant or stupid.  Very sheople like.
  • The third bullet point is pointLESS
  • No one sane or educated (and sensible) claims all Muslims are terrorist.  Typical progressive misdirection by inference.  However, the REAL THREAT of radical Islamists isn’t diminished by such assertions.
  • This one is just a lie.  Republican run states do MUCH better than Lib/Prog states.  Learn some economics silly sheople.
  • Another lie.  Does it make you feel all fuzzy to believe crap instead of fact?  See some detailed statistics unless those make lib/progs go blind.
  • Who cares what Hitler did?  He’s a dead megalomaniac who didn’t practice religion, regardless what he “said”.  More fascinating is to divine what the hell is the purpose of this point?  Psst.  Leftists are much more in line with Nazi/Fascist politics than anyone in the U.S. who speaks for real individual liberty.
  • Canada is Socialist, small population and weak.  Who cares if they want to redefine a legal tradition hundreds to thousands years old.  No one with sense would want to be like Canada.  There is no “marriage” between same sex people, no matter how they try to bully and coerce society at large
  • Killing unborn children is legal in the U.S.  So nice to see you get one right (picture maker).  The therefore is really stupid.  Read the Constitution.  Nice to see Lib/Progs value convenience and self more than innocent human lives.  Typical to see that Leftists think that just because they support something (or oppose it) the Constitution just MUST too.
  • True the word “Christianity” doesn’t appear.  This does however “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names.”  Now I wonder which deist, atheist (or whatever liberals lie about the founders) member would have allowed that.

We understand the paradigm.  Liberal beliefs are EASY.  Other people will help (or be forced to) so I can avoid effort and discomfort and decision making.  Do you want help coerced from others?  If you do, shame on you.  You should help others on YOUR OWN of your own volition.  Non-sheople do just that.  Liberals don’t give like conservatives because that would be hard.  Lib/Progs and most Demonrats would rather do what’s easiest to make themselves feel good without having to actually DO ANYTHING themselves.  If you believe the government exists to provide benefits, cash or stuff to the citizenry then your are ignorant or an idiot or BOTH.  If you adhere to such knowing better you have no political good in you.

What do you think?

    Oh the outrage, oh the symbolic and content free demands.  Now for the reality…

    Each of these in the picture is predicated on ZERO accounting for the real, live person killed (or not) or delivered and kept(or given away).

    Cases of Rape/non-consensual sex are different and more complicated so we’ll do that one last.

    How selfishly angry can a person get?  How callous can they be?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1. All Republicrats and all tea party participants aren’t pro-life.

    2. You, who subscribe to this placard, are not zoo animals.  Of course, no one has asserted that.

    3. Only rapists cause any woman to “become pregnant against her will”.  Killing unborn people in-utero is one response to your having CHOSEN (in the prepoderant majority of cases).

    4. Elephants and tea party people don’t care if women or men choose to use contraception and haven’t proposed proscribing it.  They oppose people who don’t believe in it being forced to pay for it.  They oppose the notion that FREE contraception (or anything) is a “right”. 

    5. I’ve never heard or seen any conservative or libertarian originalist speak in any respect or interest “into” anyone’s sexual organs.

    6. People who oppose abortion generally are concerned about saving a life rather than your justifications (“life circumstances”) for killing one.

    7. “Religious views” as with any views are constitutionally protected and its not possible to “cram” faith anywhere.  Any “cramming” is your own paranoia or seeking.  This IS a free country and we are FREE to express our faith anywhere, anytime.

    8. Yes, but isn’t the issue you deciding, not for yourselves, but for another person you don’t want to deal with?  See women don’t get pregnant on accident.  If you were son concerned about your vagina why didn’t you keep the penis from entering it?

    9.  Number 8 leads into a compelling argument.  Rape is heinous and brutal and ugly.  Any child conceived isn’t the rapist, never was and never will be.

    No one is “attacking women” dearie.  The only “attacks” on women are figments of paranoid imaginations or crass political manipulators stories.

    Misrepresent your opposition and you weaken yourself.  How can such an issue be solved with such sophmoric arguments that make the placard make seem like nothing but a strident selfish weenie seeking sexual intercourse with those darn consequences (babies).

    See what your fixation on your vagina disregards.  

    Posted by: FredA | July 24, 2012

    Understand the 2nd Amendment

    Thanks to Donald for this:
    The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
    The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
    The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
    The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
    Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”
    The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.
    During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.
    The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.
    Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: “The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”
    “This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power.”
    The Honorable William Gordon
    Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917

    Older Posts »

    Categories

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.